WeaknessesSometimes the stun device and excessive contact get criticized — not everyone is comfortable; clear briefing and consent are needed. There are complaints about small organizational things: waiting at the entrance, actors' backstage chatter, occasional minor flaws in the location. Some felt the puzzles were too few or flew by too quickly.
StrengthsProduction design and sound are cinematic: beautiful, rich, and very immersive. The actor delivers powerfully and subtly adapts to the team. Transitions between rooms and the mechanics hook you and stick in memory.
SecurityBefore the start they explain the rules and contact levels; you can opt out of hard effects. Some reviews mention the stun device and occasional injury-risk bits — clarify the conditions and choose a comfortable level.
Level of fearGenuinely scary: many scream and come out on trembling legs. Suitable for children and teens on light modes or without the actor — people play that way too and leave satisfied.
Actors' gameThe actor is the star of this quest: appears suddenly, keeps the tension, and can both scare and play with the pace. The level of physical contact and interaction is adjustable; they soften it on request.
Quality of riddlesPuzzles are varied, mostly fair and tied to the story; hints arrive on time. Difficulty fluctuates: from 'stuck long in the first' to 'powered through,' but the logic is consistent. Sometimes people expect more challenge than there is.
PlotBy the plot, you enter the world of a maniac-artist who collects emotions as exhibits. The second chapter develops the idea through a series of locations and trials, without overexplaining.
Difficulty levelMedium difficulty: newcomers feel comfortable with hints; experienced players find it interesting due to the atmosphere and performance rather than hardcore puzzles. At high fear levels, thinking is objectively harder — that's by design.
Reviews