WeaknessesSometimes there are “fake” or illogical puzzles, and the tech occasionally fails. It can be a bit dirty, so avoid light clothes. Some teams complained the actor was predictable and audible in advance.
StrengthsAtmosphere and sets feel cinematic; light and sound build suspense. Actors keep the tension and guide the team flexibly, hints arrive on time. Lots of nods to the franchise, plot twists land.
SecurityClear briefing before the start, they ask about well-being, props are generally safe. In contact modes everything is controlled, but wear simpler clothes — it can get dirty.
Level of fearMostly scary, especially on advanced modes, but you can choose the intensity. Kids 11–12 have done it and got spooked, so for younger ones — with caution and on a lighter mode.
Actors' gameActing is often top-notch: they engage, scare in varied ways, and don’t overdo physical contact. Occasionally people note there’s one actor and his appearance is predictable.
Quality of riddlesTasks are varied, sometimes tricky and logical; without hints it can be tough. There are debatable solutions and elements from older versions; sometimes mechanisms glitch. Hints help, but more transparency in the logic is desired.
PlotThe plot has you reconstruct events and live through an investigative experiment, keeping you tense until the finale. There are unexpected moments and callbacks to the films.
Difficulty levelAbove-average difficulty: experienced players will love it, newcomers should sensibly take hints. Sometimes the solution is simpler than it seems, but that’s not always obvious.
Reviews